U-Lourdes: uvuka eselulini futhi uhamba ngezinyawo zakhe

Da UPaolo Tescione - Julayi 13, 2016

UKUXHUMANA NGESIMANGALISO SE-LOURDES
nguMaurizio Magnani

Isimangaliso ngu-Anna Santaniello waseSarrrno, manje oneminyaka engaphezu kwamashumi ayisishiyagalolunye kodwa esingaphansi kweminyaka engamashumi amane lapho ngo-1952 welashwa ekuguleni kwakhe, ngemuva kohambo oluya eLourdes.

Masicacise imigomo yendaba futhi sizame ukuqonda ukuthi kungani, futhi, njengemimangaliso engama-66 kaLourdes, ememezela lo mcimbi wokuphilisa ngokuthi "angaphezu kwawemvelo" noma "ongaphezulu kwendalo" uyisiphetho esiyingozi esingangitholi kunoma yikuphi vuma.

Nasi isifinyezo salokho okwabhalwa amaphephandaba mayelana necala (isib. La Stampa, 17/12/2005). U-Ana wayephethwe yiBouillaud's Syndrome, isifo senhliziyo esibi, okukholelwa ukuthi sasingelapheki ngaleso sikhathi, esesebulele abafowabo ababili kusukela ebuntwaneni. Lesi sifo sivele ngokuhlaselwa wukuphefumula kanye nezinhlungu ezingalweni nasemilenzeni okwaphoqa lona wesifazane ukuthi aphile isikhathi sakhe esiningi embhedeni.

Ngo-1952 lona wesifazane wanquma, hhayi ngokunconywa odokotela, ukuba bathathe uhambo lokuya eLourdes aluthatha ngesitimela, elele ngesikebhe; ngaphambi kokufika lapho abona khona insikazi ebunjiwe esibhakabhakeni ithi "kumele ufike, kumele uze". Ukufika eLourdes u-Ana wangeniswa echibini lokubhukuda lomhume waseMassabielle ngemuva kokungeniswa esibhedlela izinsuku ezintathu.

Ngokushesha nje ngemuva kokuhudula, kuqhutshwa ubunzima bemilenze evuvukele ne-cyanotic, laba besifazane bazizwa benomuzwa wokuhlala kahle nokufudumala okukhulu esifubeni. Ngemuva kwesikhashana umfazi wakwazi ukusukuma emilenzeni; kwakungu-Agasti 20, 1952.

Lapho ebuya eLourdes, u-Ana wakwazi ukuzimela futhi, wama eTurin, wavakashelwa udokotela, uDkt Dogliotti, udokotela wezifo zenhliziyo, owayengazi ngalesi sifo, ethola isiguli sisesimweni esihle kakhulu senhliziyo.

Ekufikeni kwakhe eSarerno, icala lika-Anna Santaniello lalethwa kumbhishobhi ngaleso sikhathi obize ikhomishini yezokwelapha engafinyelelanga umbono ongasho lutho, ngakho uphenyo lwaqhubeka nokumiswa ngaphandle kokuthola isahlulelo esiqondile.

Ngo-Agasti 10, 1953, unyaka owodwa ngemuva kokululama, u-Ana wabuyela eLourdes ukuvakasha kokuqala ngenkathi okunye ukuvakasha kwenzeka okuphindwe kabili ngo-1960. Eminyakeni emibili kamuva, ngo-1962, udokotela wezokwelapha waseSantaniello wafika ku-International Medical Committee yaseParis lapho U-1964 wakhipha isimemezelo sokuthi kunokululama okungaphezulu futhi wathumela impendulo kumbhishobhi omkhulu waseSareno.

Isethulo esiphezulu sigcine leli fayela ekhabetheni iminyaka engaphezu kwengu-40, kuze kube ngu-2004 lapho kwenziwa olunye uhlolo lwezinhliziyo olwenziwe ngenhliziyo, ngomhla ka-21/09/2005, okuqinisekisile ukuthi lo msebenzi uzopholisa, okwenza indlela yesimangaliso esemthethweni yenzeka ngenyanga kwenza. Isimangaliso sokugcina sikaLourdes samenyezelwa ngonyaka we-1999 futhi sathinta uJean-Pierre Bely, indoda yaseBelgium eneminyaka engu-51.

Njengoba ngingenayo imibhalo ethile yomtholampilo ebhekene necala lika-Ana Santaniello, angikwazi ukwenza isinqumo esiphelele futhi esinemininingwane, kepha umlando wokuphulukiswa kanye nesimangaliso uyahamba, njengakwamanye amacala kaLourdes, engabaza kakhulu, unqikekile ngempela.

Esahlukweni sencwadi yami ngeLourdes ngichaze ukuthi kuyini inqubo yokubona lesi simangaliso futhi esimweni sika-Ana angiziboni ziqhathaniswa namanye amacala kodwa inkinga yangempela ukuthi wonke amacala kaLourdes angalingani ngokwesimo somtholampilo- isivivinyo sanamuhla. Umcwaningi nomphenyi wanamuhla wemitholampilo, empeleni, kufanele alandele uchungechunge lwemithetho, izixwayiso, izinyathelo zokuphepha ezazingahlonishwa ngesikhathi kusenziwa uphenyo lomtholampilo waseLourdes, kusukela emaphutheni ohlelweni lokuqoqwa kwedatha emitholampilo mayelana nokuthi yikuphi namuhla izincwadi zezokwelapha ziyaxwayisa.

Akugcinanga lapho lapho kwakungekho amathuluzi obuchwepheshe abenele okwedlule okwazile ukufeza ukuxilongwa okujwayelekile kepha akubanga khona ndlela yesimanjemanje yokwakha ukuhlolwa okubucayi, ngokuvumeleka kokuzithemba okuvumelekile (isilinganiselo esibaluleke kakhulu sezibalo).

Isifo sika-Ana, okuthe noma ngasiphi isimo saba nemiphumela emibi (njengoba kubhaliwe emaphephandabeni) sinikezwe ukuthi uBouillaud's S. akekho omunye ngaphandle kwe-Acute Articular Rheumatism (RAA) noma i-Rheumatic Disease (yelashwa ngempumelelo ezigidini zamacala ku emhlabeni wonke nge-penicillin, i-aspirin ne-corticosteroids) esikhathini esidlule kubonise ukuguquguquka okuguquguqukayo okungaholela ekufeni ezinganeni noma kunciphise impilo kancane kancane, kwesinye isikhathi kuvumele impilo ecishe ibe njalo kuze kube yilapho sebekhulile.

Iqiniso lokuthi u-Ana wayeseneminyaka engama-41 ubudala libonisa ukuthi isimo sakhe besingesiso esibi kakhulu nokuthi i-diagnostosis ibingakahloliswanga ngokwemigomo eyamukelekayo namuhla.

Ngokuqondene nalomtholampilo, odokotela bebelokhu bethola ukungaboni ngaso linye ngezikhathi ezithile phakathi kwe-Symbomatology, okungahle kube sengathi kuyamangaza, futhi imiphumela yelebhu kanye nelebhu futhi ngokungangabazeki, isikweletu sinikezwa laba bokugcina hhayi kulowo owedlule ekwakheni ukutholakala kokuxineka kobunzima kanye nokuhlolwa kwengqondo .

Kepha ngonyaka we-1952 amathuluzi ambalwa athembekile wokuhlola asusa zonke izinkinga ezitholakala ekuphazamisweni kwe-systemic kanye nezibalo ezivivinyweni zemitholampilo (khumbula izixwayiso zeBayes). Eqinisweni, i-RAA, isifo esidalwa yi-bacterium, i-beta streptococcus etholakala ku-pharynx, yathinta inhliziyo ikakhulukazi inhliziyo (ikakhulukazi i-endocardium ngezinkinga ezinama-valves enhliziyo kanye ne-myocardium) kanye nokuhlangana (okuye kwavutha futhi kwavuvukala kusuka ekuchitheni intracapsular) futhi kwaholela ekufeni ikakhulukazi ngenxa yokungalingani okukhulu kwe-valve.

Lesi sifo sithinteke kakhulu yizimo zokuhlanzeka, umsoco, isimo sezulu esinempilo nezindlu futhi singalapheka nge-cortisone, i-aspirin (ikhona kusukela ngesikhathi sabaseGibhithe) kanye ne-penicillin (ngokulungisa okwenziwe ngo-1946 e-USA), izidakamizwa impela zitholakala I-Italiya neFrance ngo-1952 (kwenziwa ini ku-Anna ngalezo zinsuku ezi-3 zokulaliswa esibhedlela eLourdes?).

I-RAA namuhla ibizwa nge- ndlela ehlukile futhi yahlanganiswa phakathi kwezifo ezithintekayo: I-PNEI (i-psiconeuroendocrinoimmunology) iyithatha njenge-pathology enengxenye yengqondo. I-RAA prognosis ibingase ibizwe ngokuthembekile (umuzwa wokuhlola owamukelekayo) kuphela ngobuchwepheshe besimanje, obufana ne-echocardiography, obuhlola inani nezingcindezi zemithambo yenhliziyo nemingcele enjenge-Ejection Fraction (ukuhamba kwegazi inhliziyo) ukuthi uma, kuma-50s, ibalwa nezinsimbi ezinjenge-phonocardiogram, imanometry ehlaselayo (inhliziyo catheterization) nezinye izindlela manje ezishiywe ngomuthi ngoba zinendawo emincane kakhulu futhi, kodwa, ngaleso sikhathi, eyayikwazi ukwenza kahle ezibhedlela ezimbalwa kakhulu. Bese kuba khona okunye ukucatshangelwa.

- Njengoba ngiphindaphinde kaninginingi encwadini yami, lapho isifo sande kakhulu (imvamisa kubantu), ukusatshalaliswa kwayo kweGaussian kuvumela ukutholwa kwezibalo eziningi kakhulu "zomsila", okusho imicimbi kude kakhulu nokujwayelekile kwesilinganiso: inani lokuphulukisa obekulindelekile, kubhekwe njengokungajwayelekile (izimangaliso!) kanye nokufa okumbalwa kakhulu (okungekho Bandla elikhulumayo futhi ayikho iLourdes eyisebenzisayo ukwenza ukuqhathanisa kwezibalo nokubala ukuhlolwa kokubaluleka kwezibalo ... okubizwa ngokuthi yizimangaliso ezilwa noma izimangaliso ezingekho!) .

- Izivivinyo zokupholisa zikaLourdes zihlala ziqhathaniswa “ngezimo zangaphambi nangemva” kepha zilinda isikhathi eside ukuthi kuhlolwe isimo somtholampilo (ukuvakasha kokuqala kwethimba lezokwelapha eliqeqeshiwe kaningi kuza unyaka noma ngaphezulu ngemuva kwamaqiniso okusolwa ukuphulukisa) kuthinta ukuthembeka kokuqhathanisa, kanye nabacwaningi belwazi lwanamuhla abazi, ngaphandle kokuthi yonke imibiko yomtholampilo iqinisekile ngokuphelele futhi ngaphandle kokungabaza, izimo ngokuvamile akunakwenzeka ukuba zihloniphe ngisho nanamuhla, ake kuyekwe ngo-1952. muva nje ka-21/09/05 siqinisekisile isimo samanje sasemitholampilo sempilo yenhliziyo futhi akukho okunye. Isimo seqiniso se-anatomo-pathological kanye ne-instrumental yesifo sasingachazeki ngesikhathi sokuphulukiswa ngokuthembela, ngokuqinisekile hhayi ngokuya ngezinqubo zanamuhla futhi ngakho-ke ukuqhathanisa akuhleliwe.

- Ekuvakasheni kuka-1952, okwenziwa eTurin nguDkt. Dogliotti, uchwepheshe odumile wezinhliziyo, angikwazi ukusho okuningi kepha wonke udokotela omuhle kufanele enze i-anamnesis (umlando wezokwelapha) ngaphambi kokuhambela ngakunye futhi ngaleyo ndlela afunde ngalokho okwandulelayo: kanjani kuthiwa yini uGogliotti wayengazi lutho ngalesi sifo? Iqiniso lokuthi udokotela wezinhliziyo waseTurin akazange enze uphenyo olubanzi lwezibhedlela (ukulashwa esibhedlela) futhi washeshe waqinisekisa isimo sempilo sesiguli uveza ukungabaza nokungacaci, futhi ngoba uma ubufakazi bakhe (bubaluleke kakhulu ngoba bukhona ezinsukwini ezimbalwa ngemuva kosolwa isimangaliso) bekungalawuleki, kwenzeka kanjani ukuthi ikhomishini yezokwelapha ebizwe ngumbhishobhi omkhulu waseSarrno ngokushesha nje ngemuva kokubuya kuka-Ana ekhaya ingafinyelelanga isahlulelo? Ngokusobala ukungabaza kwethu namuhla, wayekhuliswe ngodokotela abanekhono eminyakeni engama-50 eyedlule ababengaqinisekanga ngezinto ezihlukile zokuphikisana konke.

- Lowo okholwayo ekubonakaleni kwesimangaliso uvame ukumangalela ongakholwayo ngokuthi ungabaza ngokweqile nokuthi akayeki ukubandlulula ebukhoneni bokuthi uNkulunkulu ukhona emhlabeni. Kungamangalelwa angenasisekelo, hhayi ngoba isimangaliso empeleni akuyona ubufakazi bokuthi uNkulunkulu ukhona emhlabeni (futhi ukube bekungudemoni noma umoya ongeyena owaphezulu noma okunye ukuthanda izimangaliso?) Kufakazelwa ukholo lokukholwa abaningi, ngisho nababhishobhi nabakhadinali, abangakholelwa ezimangalisweni kepha ngaphezu kwakho konke, ngoba okhozayo "ongaphezu kwesilinganiso" akatholakali ngamagama asemthethweni anengqondo. Singakhuluma kanjani ngesimo sokungabaza esingenangqondo kithi amaNtaliyane angakwazi ukubona icala elibalulekile lixazululwa (i-Ustica, isitimela sase-Italicus, isiteshi saseBologna, uPiazza Fontana eMilan, njll.) Lapho izintshisekelo ezisengozini zikhulu, njenge zingaba yilezo zokuvikela imfundiso yenkolo eshukumisela izigidi zabathembekile emhlabeni kanye namaphothifoliyo abo? Singakholelwa kanjani ekuthembekeni kofakazi abalangazelela isimangaliso futhi okuthi, yize bengazi, baqonde ukuzikhohlisa nokuzikhohlisa? Singasemukela kanjani nje kuphela isinqumo seziphathimandla zenkolo ebeziqamba amanga eminyakeni eyizinkulungwane sazi ukuthi baqamba amanga (ngabe uKristu wayekhona ngempela? Wazalwa kuphi ngempela futhi wayehlala kuphi? Kungani kwasungulwa isihogo, isihlanzo, okwakushiswa ngezigidi zamadoda emhlabeni? njll njll.) Inqobo nje uma umbono wokukholwa hhayi obonakalayo utholwa, akukho nsiza eyenziwa ekufuneni iqiniso lezinto. Ukukholwa (= ukwethembana) kungaba yisimo esivumayo kepha kuqukethe ubungozi obukuholela ekuholeni okugxilisiwe kombono wangempela, umbono we-monochordic futhi ovame ukubekezelela. Ngakho-ke, ake sibeke abantu abangenalo ubandlululo lwenkolo bavunyelwe ukuphenya ngokujulile ngezinto zenkolo, kufaka phakathi nezimangaliso okusolwa ngazo. Ngakolunye uhlangothi, njengoba "isimangaliso" sika-Ana Santaniello siqinisekisa, kunezizathu eziningi zokungabaza, kufaka phakathi nalokho okuphathelene nombuzo: "ngoba umbhishobhi waseSarrno ngawo-50 wanquma ukugcina ifayili lika-Ana ekhabetheni Iminyaka engu-40 ngenkathi umbhishobhi wezi-2005 enquma ukuyikhipha, namuhla nje, kulelo khulu lama-50 leminyaka ukuthi "kusesimweni esifushane" sokuphilisa "izimangaliso" (lezo zesithombe kunalokho kuningi), iminyaka lapho izigidi Abahambi bayaqhubeka nokuya eLourdes (yibhizinisi elinje!) bengaboni isimangaliso esaziwa ngokusemthethweni isikhathi eside? ” Kulungile, ubuhlakani besonto kanye nenhlonipho yomthetho okumele siqiniseke ngokuqhubeka kokuphiliswa okuyisimangaliso, kepha iminyaka engama-15 ayiningi kakhulu uma ucabanga ukuthi kwezinye izimangaliso abebekulindele iminyaka eyi-25 - XNUMX?

Okokugcina, nokuvuma ukuthi iNkosazana inxusa abagulayo (i-etsi virgo daretur, kube sengathi iNcasakazi yanikezwa, ikhona ngempela) singangabazi kanjani imvelo yokwephulukisa esetshenziswa yiSonto LaseRoma futhi ikhohlise ngokungafanele, ngaphandle kokuqinisekiswa kwesayensi amakhomishini abucayi ngempela? Ngeshwa manje kunobufakazi obuningi obuqongelelwe izifundiswa eziningi eziqinisekisa ukuthi iSonto belisebenzisa amaqiniso omlando namaqiniso ukuze lisizakale iminyaka engama-2000, ngaphandle kokungabaza noma ukubhala phansi, njengoba kufakazelwa ukuphulukiswa kukaLourdes, akukaze kucace, kungakaze kube namathunzi, monde kusuka izinsolo.